Avoiding Trick-or-treaters

In order to not have to give sweets to kids in Halloween costumes (how American; how ghastly!), Kathy & I went out to Bath’s new Odeon cinema last night. Yeah, I know – I ranted about their woefully inadequate web site back in July and their response to Matthew Somerville, who was …uh … doing them a favour. Five months on, and the site still blows, except they’ve added a "text-only film times" facility. "Here you go, disabled people, please use our other entrance. You know, the one you can actually use"

Right, now that’s out of my system, I can move on to the actual cinema and the film we went to see: Finding Neverland.

The cinema is bright, cavernous and airy inside. I’m always more impressed by inner-urban – rather than leisure-park – multiplexes, because they have to respond to their surroundings and use space in creative ways. So, in the space previously occupied by a Ford dealership, we have a pub, an eight-screen cinema and soon-to-be-added restaurants and a health club. Ticket prices are extortionate — £6.50 each — but we weren’t paying ‘cos we had vouchers for Christmas. Yes, last Christmas. Leg-room is in short supply, but that doesn’t bother a shorty like me.

And so to the film: Finding Neverland is a dramatised biopic of J.M. Barrie. Well, not his whole life — presumably that could take somewhat more than two hours — but rather the period during which he wrote Peter Pan. It’s sad — there’s illness and death — and I saw some of the film through misty eyes (the musical-strings-to-heartstrings interface is strong in this one). Anyway, I’m not a film reviewer so I’ll keep this short: you need to believe in fairies, or the fairies will die.

Top film – go see!

Debut for internet film

The new film by Full Monty writer Simon Beaufoy will become the first to be launched officially over the internet. This is Not a Love Song, which stars Harry Potter actor David Bradley, will be streamed from 1800 BST on Friday. — http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/film/3082856.stm

The film’s web site is here.

But…

“You will need:
* To be based in the UK
* To be running Microsoft Windows XP, 98, SE, Me or 2000 (gah!)
* To have Microsoft Windows Media Player 9 Series installed
* One of the [credit] cards shown opposite.”

Then they have the gall to say:

“Accessibility for all…” — not if you’re on *nix or Mac, it isn’t, or don’t possess a credit/debit card.

“The film will be available in the following versions:

  • A subtitled version for the deaf and hard of hearing
  • An audio-described version for the blind and visually impaired
  • A standard version” (WTF?)

Gah. Gah. Gah. Micro$oft 0wn j00.

Cinematic Excursions

You wait ages to see a film with Anna Paquin in, and two come along at once. Actually it was a coincidence that she was in the last two films I’ve seen: 25th Hour and X2.

25th Hour is the first Spike Lee film I’ve ever seen. I was impressed, as he refuses to let his films be formulaic jelly-mould cash cows. Edward Norton, as always, gives a fantastic performance – this time as a drug dealer who has one more day of freedom before being jailed for seven years.

His character, though undoubtedly a person who profits from others’ misery, comes across as a generally nice bloke, something that John (Hen Night Lorna’s fiancé and my cinema companion for the evening) found to be a little unbelievable. A reviewer at IMDB.com thought the character, Monty, was rather like Norton’s character in Fight Club. I don’t know, as I haven’t seen it. I thought it was like his character post-imprisonment in American History X, not the soulless, apparently evil pusher of most people’s imaginings.

Last night we saw X2, which sounds like a bus route, but is in fact a very good film. There are so many sequels out at the moment or coming soon, and they usually fail to live up to the first film, but X2 succeeds in continuing an impressive, action-packed storyline with a thinly-veiled message about xenophobia.

While in the first film the delineation between the good guy and the bad was quite clear, in X2 there are more shades of grey. Lacking this moral absolutism, and with the death of one of the main characters, the film is much darker than its predecessor, and there is more violence, more senseless-yet-sanitised killing. This doesn’t make it a bad film, however; the filmmakers wanted maximum reach, so the violence isn’t graphic. But by hiding the grim reality of what guns and bombs do to the human body, do we just produce society to think that there is no consequence to violence?

Anna Paquin: go see. Twice.