Salon.com: The New Pentagon Papers

A long but fascinating insider account of the build up to war inside The Pentagon, and the influence of the neoconservative Office of Special Plans (OSP) over the White House policy decisions that led to the war in Iraq:

Saddam Hussein had gassed his neighbors, abused his people, and was continuing in that mode, becoming an imminently dangerous threat to his neighbors and to us—except that none of his neighbors or Israel felt this was the case. Saddam Hussein had harbored al-Qaida operatives and offered and probably provided them with training facilities—without mentioning that the suspected facilities were in the U.S./Kurdish-controlled part of Iraq. Saddam Hussein was pursuing and had WMD of the type that could be used by him, in conjunction with al-Qaida and other terrorists, to attack and damage American interests, Americans and America—except the intelligence didn’t really say that. Saddam Hussein had not been seriously weakened by war and sanctions and weekly bombings over the past 12 years, and in fact was plotting to hurt America and support anti-American activities, in part through his carrying on with terrorists—although here the intelligence said the opposite.

Fresh Browser Lockout

I don’t often discover much arbitrary lockout stupidity these days. The Web Standards message seems to be getting through to the people at the code-face: developers at large corporates or their design agencies.

Occasionally a site will crop up with 2000-era broken browser-sniffing, like O2’s XDA site. I surfed on over using my browser of choice (Mozilla Firefox) and was presented with the following message:

This website has been optimised for Internet Explorer 5+ and Netscape 6+. We have detected that you have an older browser installed. Please update to the latest version browser to view this website.
– http://www.xda-2.co.uk/upgrade_browser.html

AAAGGGGGHHHH!

How many times will I have to write to a clueless web development team to inform them that it doesn’t get much more "latest version" than Firefox 0.8? It is so much more modern than Netscape 6 that it’s easy to forget that they are from the same development source.

I’ll let you know how I get on…

UPDATE

Dear 02/xDA Webmaster,
I am trying to view your website. Because I don’t use one of your "approved" browsers (IE5+ or NS6+) I an being denied entry. I gained entry in the end by disabling JavaScript in my browser. Once I was in the site, it worked perfectly, proving that your browser detection is broken and flawed.
While I accept that it is your prerogative to decide who should gain access to your site, don’t you think that suggesting to users of Mozilla Firefox, Mozilla 1.6 and Safari that they are using an “older” browser makes you look a little foolish? Should users of these browsers “downgrade” in order to use your site?
I am helping to evaluate the xDA for my company, so you may wish to consider the effect your developers’ tunnel vision is having on your sales. There are more browsers than IE and Netscape. Anyhow, Firefox is based on Mozilla, which is in turn the non-commercial arm of what was Netscape, before it was wound up by AOL last year. So: there is no Netscape, only Mozilla.
There is really no need for this kind of browser sniffing these days: if you design to web standards, everyone should be able to access your content, even if only the newer browsers get the full design.
Regards,
Tim Beadle